Skip to main content

How much progress have we really made?


by Molly Schwerha
|

It has been nearly twenty years since the European community came together in Strasbourg (November 1992) and under with the auspices of the Council of Europe authored the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages (European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages). This was a significant step in building a broader understanding of the importance of protecting the historical regional or minority languages of Europe.  Member states of the Council of Europe enacted the Charter to protect and promote Europe’s diverse cultural heritage. They agreed that using a regional minority language in public and private life should be a fundamental right and that actions needed to be taken to do so.  Minority languages should be taught more in education to help keep them from becoming endangered.  Promote these languages and encourage their use in speech, writing, public and private. Great principles in theory, however, it is what is practiced that really matters.   Nearly twenty years later, in the summer of 2009, a new state law was passed by Slovakia which amended Slovakia’s Language Act, challenging the heart and spirit of the treaty developed in Strasbourg.  

The new law which calls for fines up to 5000 Euros for using incorrect Slovak as well as tighter regulations for the use of “correct Slovak” is drawing strong criticism with the European Union. The amended law which effectively bans minority languages from the public realm as well as private conversations is also drawing strong criticism from neighboring Hungary.  According to an article on xpatloop.com, November 9, 2009 entitled “Slovakia Curtails Free Speech Through Restrictive language law” the Hungarian Coalition Party president, Pal Csáky referred to the new law as “linguistic imperialism – pervasive, arbitrary and punitive”.  

In an article on EuroActiv.com, German MEP Michael Gahler has slammed the new Slovak law saying it does not conform to EU standards and it is discriminatory against minority languages.   He has been quoted as saying “Slovakia is violating commonly respected standards in the EU and is disregarding respective recommendations of the Council of Europe, which foresee the extended use of minority languages”.  He went on the say “(Slovakia) risks discrediting itself as an EU member and becoming a totalitarian state again if the new provisions are consistently applies. An example of the new law cited in the xtaloop.com article by the Hungarian Human Rights Organization expresses some of the concerns with the new law.   “Imagine you are in your homeland, purchasing a rail ticket at the local train station.  You walk up to the ticket counter and ask for a ticket in your own language.  The clerk replies in your own language, but the train company is fined for this “crime”.  Is this an Orwellian nightmare?  Unfortunately, no.  As of September 11, 2009, this is a realistic scenario in Slovakia – a member of NATO and the European Union. A country located in the heart of Europe”.  

The question remains, “how much progress have we really made?“ Is this recent change in Slovakia an isolated situation or is it the beginning of a series of changes across the European Union?  Is the basic principles outlined at Strasbourg at risk?  Are regional and minority languages actually getting the respect that they deserve? This is violating the Charter enacted by the Council of Europe.  I would like to hear more from the people of Slovakia.  Please feel free to respond to the comments section.  


Molly Schwerha is a senior in Childhood Education at the University of Illinois. She composed this blog entry while enrolled in the European Union Center’s Language and Minorities in Europe (418) cross-listed course that she took to learn more about issues in bilingual education in the EU.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

The moderators of the Linguis Europae blog reserve the right to delete any comments that they deem inappropriate. This may include, but is not limited to, spam, racist or disrespectful comments about other cultures/groups or directed at other commenters, and explicit language.

Popular posts from this blog

Les langues sont belles : Codeswitchons!

by Katherine Stegman-Frey Katherine Stegman-Frey is a graduate student in Hispanic Linguistics at the University of Illinois. She is planning on teaching English and Spanish as a second language and is interested in language and culture and how humans use them. She wrote this blog entry as a student in 418 ‘Language and Minorities in Europe.' En 2015, du 14 au 22 mars, on a fêté la 20e semaine de la langue française et de la Francophonie.  Comme contribution, le CSA (le Conseil Supérieur de l’Audiovisuel) a affiché un clip sur Youtube où il s’agit du code-switching et de l’emprunt lexical de l’anglais au français. Il va sans dire que le sujet de l’utilisation des mots anglais, des anglicismes, dans les interactions françaises est vraiment vivant et toujours disputé.  En même temps, l’emprunt des mots n’est pas un nouveau phénomène pour les deux côtés de la Manche.  Il existe depuis longtemps et il y a beaucoup d’exemples dans l’histoire.  On trouve quelques n...
Post a Comment
Read more

La Charte Européenne des langues régionales ou minoritaires: la France et ses relations avec le breton et le basque

by Natasha Sharp | editors:  Alessia Zulato (PhD candidate in French) Zsuzsanna Fagyal (Associate Professor of French) | En 1992, le Conseil de l’Europe a voulu promouvoir et protéger des langues régionales et minoritaires qui sont en voie de disparition. Le Conseil de l’Europe a donc établi un traité international, La Charte Européenne des langues régionales ou minoritaires , pour inciter les états européen à préserver leurs langues locales qui font partie du patrimoine historique et culturel l’Europe. La Charte prévoit la protection et la promotion des langues utilisées traditionnellement par les minorités historiques et territoriales. La Charte confère à ces langues un statut et elle oblige les états qui la ratifient de prendre des mesures de protection pour préserver les langues dans les régions où elles sont parlées. Le texte de ce traité explique que les pays européens doivent permettre à leurs ressortissants d’utiliser leurs langues régionales ou minori...
Post a Comment
Read more

Beyond the Borders: Being Polish in Chicago

By Weronica Dabros Weronica Dabros was a senior majoring in Integrative Biology and minoring in Polish when she wrote this blog post in 418 ‘Language and Minorities in Europe’ in spring 2019. She was planning on applying to dental schools to continue her career in health. They have been named the za chlebem (“For Bread”) migrants from a damaged country. They are the land hungry immigrants; the peasants, the censored, the opportunists. They are the low-skilled wage laborers. They are, as far as their origins in this country are concerned, the Polish of Chicago . Chicago 1950 (Source: wikimedia commons ) In the 19th century, Chicago was a growing city with industrial companies that provided many immigrants with greater opportunities to achieve their own ‘American Dream’. With the influx of various immigrants from Eastern Europe in the 1890’s, Chicago lured more Poles than any American city (Radzialowski 1976). Chicago became ‘Poland elsewhere’ beyond the borders of the Republi...
Post a Comment
Read more